[guide-user] problem with adding OAG chip

Bernd Klemt bernd.klemt at hs-bochum.de
Fri Apr 24 14:04:13 EDT 2020


Hello Joe,

thanks for your help. I solved the problem (see attachment, if allowed). My line 
looks as following, again beside the line break:

Moravian G2-8300 + ASI290Mini    KAF-8300     5.4      5.4  3358  2536  215 
0,.7,.31,.23,1936,1096

It looks the same beside the distance of the guiding chip from the main chip (at 
the moment I don't know the actual separation). It was murphy or a too 
"intelligent" editor! For editing I used Notepad++ and it substituted spaces with 
a tab. When opening the camera file with  the standard Editor I immideately saw 
that the columns were not in line. Correcting this and the guiding chip appears 
in Guide!

Clear skies
Bernd

Am 24 Apr 2020 um 11:26 hat JoeMize geschrieben:

> Bernd, the following I saved in 2017, it´s a discussion with Bill Grey adding a
> 2nd guiding chip for my MMOAG opposite the on-board STL11K guiding chip and
> rotated 90deg for better field coverage.  I hope this helps you find your
> problem...joe  :)
> 
> Actual ccds.nam SBIG Research 11000XM line, new guider chip highlighted - works
> perfectly.  SBIG Research 11000XM            KAF-11000M   9        9    4008  2672
>  917 0,.6231,.1313,.1477,640,480 0,-1.08117,.098470,.196939,480,640  
> 
> Bills discussion follows, unfortunately in a future conversation Bill couldn´t
> get the "dotted path" of the MMOAG chip to display...joe
> 
> From: Bill Gray 
> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 8:23 PM
> To: Joe Mize 
> Subject: Fwd: Re: [guide-user] Is Guide9 capable of displaying 'two' Guider chips?
> 
> Hi Joe,
> 
>     From our original correspondence back in early 2016... must admit,
> I'd completely forgotten about it.  But fortunately,  it was still in
> my e-mail archives,  so I didn't have to recreate the math.
> 
> -- Bill
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [guide-user] Is Guide9 capable of displaying 'two' Guider chips?
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:06:44 -0500 From: 'Joe Mize' jmize at svic.net [guide-user]
> <guide-user at yahoogroups.com> Reply-To: guide-user at yahoogroups.com To:
> guide-user at yahoogroups.com
> 
> Thkx Bill, that did it.  I duplicated `ccd.nam´ as a backup before I appended
> your figures, "SBIG Research 11000XM KAF-11000M   9 9    4008  2672  917
> 0,.6231,.1313,.1477,640,480 _0,-1.08117,.098470,.196939,480,640_".
> 
> When starting Guide9 the new chip wasn´t displayed.  Opening "CCD Dialog",
> unchecking Show Fame, cycling the Dialog and rechecking Show Frame the second
> Guide chip appeared.  The 2nd Guide chip is perfect for Guide Star selection and
> image composition.
> 
> FYI:  Right click-dragging a line to measure the short dimension of the new chip
> Guide9 shows the following:
>      3.7412´ = 224.47"
>      PA 359.1 deg
>      RA offset : 0.0603´ = 3.6232" = 0.59 sec
>      Dec offset: 3.7404´ = 224.44"
> 
> Thkx again Bill...joe  :)
> 
> "May He Go Among the Imperishable Stars"
> Joe Mize, StarFields Observatory,
> Chiefland Astronomy Village
> http://www.cav-sfo.com/indexarchive.html
> *From:* mailto:guide-user at yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 28, 2016 10:25 AM
> *To:* guide-user at yahoogroups.com <mailto:guide-user at yahoogroups.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [guide-user] Is Guide9 capable of displaying 'two' Guider chips? Hi
> Joe,
> 
>       OK,  it should work about like this :
> 
>       The main chip is a KAF-11000,  with 4008 x 2672 pixels,  each nine
> microns square.  That makes it 36.072 x 24.048 millimeters.
> 
>       The guiding chips are both TC327s, with 640 x 480 pixels,  7.4
> millimeters square.  So they're 4.736 x 3.552 millimeters.
> 
>       The built-in guider chip is 4.736 / 36.072 = 0.13129 times the width
> of the main chip,  and 3.552 / 24.048 = 0.14770 times the height.  That
> leaves us with the separation between the chips to figure out... which,
> fortunately,  SBIG documents :
> 
> http://archive.sbig.com/sbwhtmls/ccdplacement_large.htm
> 
> (which could have spared me even the very modest amount of arithmetic
> done above).  The center-to-center distance is 15.39 millimeters, which
> is 15.39 / 24.048 = 0.63997 times the height of the main chip. Which
> is why the guider chip specification for the SBIG-11000 is
> 
> 0,.6231,.1313,.1477,640,480
> 
>       ...first the separation horizontally (zero,  in this case;  the chips
> are one over the other),  then the vertical separation (0.6231 times the
> height of the main chip,  not quite what we got... looks as if I used the
> height from the above URL,  which probably contains some non-imaging rows).
> Next,  we have the ratios in width and height between guider and main chip.
> Finally,  we specify that the guiding chip has 640x480 pixels.
> 
>       Your extra guiding chip,  being tilted 90 degrees,  would have width
> ratio 3.552/36.072 = 0.098470 and height ratio 4.736/24.048 = 0.196939.
> If it's 26 millimeters,  center to center,  from the main chip,  that would
> be 26/24.048 = 1.081171 main chip height units.  Except we'll make it
> negative, to put it on the opposite side from the built-in guiding chip.
> 
>       Tacking all that on to the existing guiding chip specifier,  we get
> 
> 0,.6231,.1313,.1477,640,480 0,-1.08117,.098470,.196939,480,640
> 
>       Edit your 'ccds.nam',  look for the SBIG 11000 line,  and add that
> second bit,  and the guiding chip will show up.  (Unfortunately, without
> a second set of guiding rings...)
> 
>       As a side note: in hindsight,  this was a really dumb design
> decision.  At the time I wrote this part of Guide,  I assumed there
> would only be a few guiding chips,  and I'd add them in as I learned of
> them.  So I didn't invest a lot of time making it user friendly.  But
> even given that,  it would have been about as easy for me to make
> the format for the above line look like this :
> 
> 0,15.39,9,9,640,480 0,-26,9,9,480,640
> 
>       ...i.e.,  offsets in millimeters,  followed by guider chip sizes in
> microns,  then guider size in pixels.  Had I done so,  it would have
> saved a lot of trouble,  both for Guide users trying to add their own
> guiding chips (or making mosaics),  and for me in terms of providing
> tech support for them.  Dunno what I was thinking when I made it the
> way I did,  but it's definitely not my finest hour.
> 
> -- Bill
> 
> "May He Go Among the Imperishable Stars"
> Joe Mize, StarFields Observatory,
> Chiefland Astronomy Village
> http://www.cav-sfo.com/indexarchive.html 
> 
> From: Bernd Klemt 
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 5:32 AM
> To: guide-user at projectpluto.com 
> Subject: [guide-user] problem with adding OAG chip
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I tried to add a guiding chip to an existing camera in CDDS.NAM and also in 
> CCDS.NAD (the german counterpart). But without success.
> 
> I raised the numer of cameras by 1 at the top of the files (201 in my case). I
> copied the existing camera entry (Moravian G2-8300)
> 
> Moravian G2-8300                 KAF-8300     5.4      5.4 3358  2536  212
> 
> and gave it a new ID which wasn't used: 215. Then I added the following 
> parameters:
> 
> 0,.9,.31,.23,1936,1096 which means that the guiding chip (a ZWO ASI290 Mini in the
> Moravian Off Axis Guider) is in the middle above the main chip and the guider chip
> has 31% of the width and 23% of the height of the main chip. And the number ot the
> pixels of the ASI290 Mini is 1936 x 1096.
> 
> So the complete line of the new camera definition looks like this (without the
> line break):
> 
> Moravian G2-8300 + ASI290Mini    KAF-8300     5.4      5.4 3358  2536  215 
> 0,.9,.31,.23,1936,1096
> 
> But whatever I do, when choosing the new camera in Guide, the ccd frame is shown
> without the guiding chip and it's surrounding circles. I even tried the values
> form several SBIG guiding chips, no success.
> 
> Any help is appreciated.
> 
> Clear skies
> Bernd
> 
> Bernd Klemt
> Sternwarte Herne
> 
> MPC  (A18)
> www.sternwarte-herne.de
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> guide-user mailing list
> guide-user at projectpluto.com
> http://projectpluto.com/mailman/listinfo/guide-user_projectpluto.com
> 

Bernd Klemt
Sternwarte Herne

MPC  (A18)
www.sternwarte-herne.de


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: with_guiding-chip.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 5966 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://projectpluto.com/pipermail/guide-user_projectpluto.com/attachments/20200424/40d320a2/attachment.gif>


More information about the guide-user mailing list